The 2014 Triennial Review of the British Council  (BC) found:

‘Conflicts of interest inherent in the present arrangements lead other UK providers of similar products and services to believe that the British Council represents unfair competition. It also finds that there are some grounds for concern that the organisation could be limiting potential opportunities for other UK providers in a growing market where the UK has significant natural advantages. In this regard some transfer of responsibility to UKTI might be appropriate’

So, after years of robust  denials that it had any negative impact on other education suppliers . or the  education market more generally, the BC had been found out.

For many years big hitting education exporters   have  complained to successive governments that the British Council was using its privileged, monopolistic position to benefit itself rather than other British based providers, which amounted to a conflict of interest. They argued, rather compellingly, that you can’t promote other  UK education providers,  abroad(a key role of the BC) while concurrently competing with them, and taking most of the big contracts , from under their noses. The BC is supposed to help the export efforts of UK plc  which is why presumably  it is   still subsidized by the UK taxpayer.   But it competes head on with  unsubsidized UK companies for big ticket contracts. Often co-located  with British embassies  it has    privileged access to  local contacts  and  local market- sensitive information, care of local diplomats.   You don’t need to be a brain surgeon to work out that this is a clear conflict of interest. It also  acts as a barrier to market entry for companies   who see the dominance of the BC, hear of the way it operates in the market  and decide its  far too risky to get involved  . Small operators  often simply get nudged aside or are  undermined by the BC.   This in turn undermines our education export success.

Education Investor now reports  that Derrick Betts, vice president at consultancy firm Parthenon-EY, is to take an externship at UKTI Education commencing in January 2016.

In November 2014, Education Investor reported that audit firm Ernst & Young (EY), Parthenon’s parent company, had been hired to advise on the restructuring of the British Council. The Foreign & Commonwealth Office has asked EY to consider three new operating models for the BC , one of which would involve transferring some of its responsibilities to UKTI Education. (see above)

Some might be worried that there is a conflict of interests here, too . But it could simply be a move that anticipates the results of the Review ie that there will be  some  transfer of responsibility to UKTI.  Matthew Robb, managing director at Parthenon-EY, told Education Investor that: “Derrick is a super hardworking guy with great expertise, particularly in private schools.” UKTI declined to comment on Mr Bett’s appointment.

We shall have to see what happens. But its worth mentioning that the BC has been very good in the past  , with FCO support, of course , at protecting what it sees as its interests, (which is not necessarily the same as  that  of  UK  taxpayers or suppliers)  and it will be lobbying behind the scenes to do just that. Whatever the outcome of the Review ,remember the plight of the small operators . UKTI is interested in the big  ticket contracts,  and big operators , the smaller ones  will probably still  have to   plough a lonely furrow, under the predatory shadow of the BC.

The Triennial Review





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s