Broadly supports Goves approach on schools reform

Labour Policy on Free Schools hard to understand


Professor Michael Barber who has just moved to Pearson Education from McKinsey (where he set up a US Education Delivery Unit)   told Peter Wilby in a Guardian  interview recently   that he broadly supports Goves devolved approach to schools. He said  “Broadly, Gove’s doing the right thing,” he says, “particularly the theme of devolution, encouraging schools to take control of their own destiny.” He also claimed that it is possible to support both the dirigiste New Labour approach and the more libertarian Tory attitude. “If you’re moving from poor to fair, as we’re doing with Pakistan’s schools and as we did with some failing schools in England, that’s one set of techniques. If you’re moving from good to great, that’s a different set. When you’re improving a bad system or bad schools, you need to be really clear: here’s what you teach, here’s the lesson plans, here’s the training. But when a system gets really good, you need to be significantly less prescriptive.” Reflecting on the literacy and numeracy strategies, he says it was a mistake to underestimate their negative effect on teachers. “I thought being enabled to do their jobs better and see children in their classes doing better would have a transformative effect. I thought teachers would say: that’s great.” (Not quite what he said by the way  in his book Instruction to Deliver) It has been widely believed that Barber was approached by Gove to take over as Permanent Secretary at the DfE just before Christmas because of concerns that the Department was not sufficiently keen to drive through his education reforms. This interview confirms that this was the case.  But Barber   declined the offer. (its not terribly easy  to  simply offload a Permanent Secretary)  Professor Barber joins Blairites Conor Ryan, Andrew Adonis, and Barry Sheerman MP, in giving qualified backing to Goves school reforms. As for former Prime Minister Tony Blair, what does he have to say about the reforms? He told the Sun “I think some of the technical aspects of reform – competition in the NHS, putting the patient first, breaking up the traditional state school system in favour of academies and trust schools – these were things we started.”

What about Andy Burnham? Well, he agrees  that autonomous schools are a good thing ,in principle at least,  and approves of Peter Hymans ( another Labour man) Newham   Free School bid but his support in hardly unqualified. He worries that not enough are starting in the most disadvantaged areas and  some may be damaging other local schools, but he hasn’t committed his party to getting rid of them should they win power.

Iain Wright,  a Shadow Junior Education Minister, told the BBC that Labours national policy is against Free schools, while  also  refusing, like Burnham,  to  commit to  their abolition.  He seemed to suggest to Andrew Neil  that the party has a ‘ pragmatic’ approach and so  will judge  each one  on  their merits    ie whether they suit  local circumstances.  Labour is clearly struggling at the moment  with its Free schools policy, keen not to alienate Labour supporting parents who rather  like the idea of Free schools . How can you be against them nationally but for them  locally? Answers on a post card please.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s