Policy on Careers advice  being decided now-professionals need to make their voice heard


Social Mobility was high on the last Government’s agenda, and it is a priority shared by the Coalition Government.

As well as being of  importance to the individuals concerned, social mobility is also important for society and for the economy. This is now widely accepted and part of mainstream thinking, informed by evidence.

The Coalition Governments  programme was unequivocal  – “We both want a Britain where social mobility is unlocked; where everyone, regardless of background, has the chance to rise as high as their talents and ambition allow them. To pave the way, we have both agreed to sweeping reform of welfare, taxes and, most of all, our schools.” (The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, 2010).

Michael Gove, the Education Secretary,  has said that schools must be the ‘engines of social mobility’.  Alan Milburn, a former Labour Cabinet Minister  who delivered a seminal report  on social mobility to the last Government,   is  now an adviser to this Government.

But improving education is not a stand-alone panacea to improve social mobility.

There are other inter-related and mutually supportive  factors at play. As politicians champion more choice,  individuals are required to make more informed  choices at different stages in their lives, and more so now than ever before. They need support in this. Individuals change their  career paths  more frequently than ever before and a “job for life” is no longer the norm.  So ensuring that they are better positioned to choose the options that best suit them, with the skills for career management and career development is crucial .

Hence, having  easy access to relevant, independent,  high quality  information advice  and guidance, informed by the labour market,  is  essential.

Social mobility is broadly dependent on individuals being empowered to take action. As Professor Alison Wolf (currently heading a review on 14-19vocational qualifications for the government) said “ Informed choices have to be a key goal but everyone has to take responsibility for the decisions they make”

So, access to sound professional advice is important for all individuals from as young as 13- choosing for instance  what subjects to study at GCSE or  their equivalent,  to meet their  career aspirations – to a fifty year old adult wishing to train and re-skill for a different work role and seeking advice as to what options are available .

A Nuffield Review (2008) suggested that ‘all education and training providers, in conjunction with Connexions, need to develop more effective Information, Advice and Guidance services to ensure an appropriate match between student, provider and course.’   With the job market more competitive now than it has been in a long time, this requirement is even more pressing.  A consensus is developing though around certain approaches . It suggests that while careers advice and guidance is being offered to some pupils, either through schools, the  Connexions service  or colleges, this advice is  too often  of  variable quality and  too rarely delivered by a professional who is properly qualified. In Connexions case, the prevailing wisdom amongst policy makers (whether factual or not) is that advice is prioritised to target those threatened with exclusion, and this service is currently suffering draconian cuts across local authorities (who have responsibility for Connexions), with damaging effects upon careers support in particular.   There is also a growing feeling (and expected to be announced shortly as confirmed Government policy) that  there should be an all-age service  and that it must ensure sufficient support for both adults and young people, without disadvantaging either. The Conservatives before the election had committed themselves to an all age Careers Service and an adviser in every secondary school . But there is growing frustration among guidance and careers professionals of a policy vacuum developing, with Connexions cuts decimating services and still no clear steer  from Ministers, post election or clear vision for the proposed all age service and too little meaningful dialogue between them, the Government and officials.

A recent report from Careers England (August 2010)  ‘Social mobility of young people and adults in England:  the contribution and impact of high quality careers services’ reflects some of this frustration. It  states ‘The creation of an all-age careers service that would replace/incorporate the careers advice offered  to young people by the Connexions, currently run by local authorities, and the national Careers Advice Service for adults has yet to be fully articulated by the new Coalition Government, nor have plans been discussed yet with employers in the careers sector and allied careers professional associations.’

The limitations of  unsuitably qualified teachers giving advice  to pupils, that is often partial, has been highlighted often enough by the professionals, backed by international studies.

The Careers Alliance (Careers England, ICG, NCN and ACEG)  has pressed  for assurances from the Government that it will favour  a partnership model with careers advisers working within institutions from their position of independence by being employed by the all age careers service, and bringing labour market and wider opportunity market information into every school and college.

It wants the Government’s help to  build capacity, assure quality, and promote expansion in careers support activities for all UK citizens through a new and dynamic re-engineered   system that  also takes account of both formal and informal careers services and careers support activities. And it wants  support  for the careers sector to raise the status of the profession and improve its all-round stature.

Politicians consistently stress the importance of universal  access to good information and guidance, yet fall short when it comes to creating the  enabling environment, with the   resources to  make it happen. Yes, we have to be realistic as  there are on-going cuts to services but  it is clear that much   more can  be achieved, within existing funding  constraints, with some  fundamental re-engineering of the architecture – and, most importantly, effective careers advice and guidance has economic pay-offs, enabling more people to engage successfully in learning, succeed in work, become tax-payers, assist wealth creation and contribute to the public purse rather than become a drain upon it .

Professionals have been  active in trying  to focus the attention of  politicians now on the importance of resourcing a reinvigorated careers service for all, realising that now is the  vital period to seek to reshape the policy  landscape.   There is  a   UK Careers Sector Strategic Forum operating . Also a Careers Profession Alliance (formerly a Colloquium)  has been formed   recently, in an attempt  by careers professional associations  to work better  together in  providing a single voice to Government on the design and development of an all-age careers service framework in England.

Careers England, the trade association for employer organisations in career education and guidance in England,  has expanded  its membership and  influence  recently (see report) and is seen as an important voice for the employers of careers guidance  professionals . It is organising a number of key meetings with DfE and DBIS officials  and its Task Groups.

The Institute for Careers Guidance also plays an important role and  through its President  Dr Deidre Hughes, it  has been arguing  robustly the case in the media and behind the scenes  for an all age careers service framework. The ICG’s annual conference takes place in Belfast this  November and John Hayes, the Minister responsible for the new Government’s Careers Service policy, is a key speaker.

The  immediate  challenge is to formulate  a coherent, clear  narrative describing what is needed, how it can be delivered and at what cost to decision makers and opinion formers.

The Careers Profession Taskforce in England  led by Dame Ruth Silver CBE, commissioned by the former Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF),  is due to report to the Government this autumn .Its recommendations will have the full endorsement of the careers sector as well as the Association of School and College Leaders. It is to be hoped that Ministers will listen to the informed and expert views of the professionals as it shapes its careers service policy.

Careers England Paper- Dr D Hughes


Towards a Strong Careers Profession’

The report of the Careers Profession Task Force

October 15 2010:

The report of the Careers Profession Task Force has been published on the Department for Education website. ICG President Dr Deirdre Hughes was one of the Task Force members, representing the Institute and the profession.

Commenting on the report, she said: “Individuals’ aspirations and achievements must be nurtured and supported so that they can maximise their talents and lead fulfilling lives. The Careers Profession Taskforce has recognised this and the growing need for individuals to have access to reliable and impartial careers information, advice and guidance. Its key findings provide an ambitious and exciting blueprint for the careers profession to build on best practice and to improve the stature and profile of its work. Clearly, having a strengthen careers profession will improve social mobility and achieve greater prosperity for future generations.”

Task Force Report



  1. In order to build and sustain upwards social mobility government requires a stimulas that will drive various opportunities into the heart of the community and thus empower people to take advantage of such opportunities.

    I strongly beleive, the Job Centre in its current form is an extremely weak indication what the ‘big society’ is meant to represent. It ceilings and windows are bare when it should be promoting opportunities such as job websites, business start-up information, job fares, stakeholder relationships… etc. It does none of the above and therefore remains reminiscent of everything that is wrong with government – everything that highlights a lack of will to understand what is required in communities to improve social mobility.

    I recently wrote to Alun Milburn to express my concerns about the challenges I encountered while trying to improve my social mobility while using the government Small Firms Loan Guarante Scheme. While Mr Milburn was courteous to respond to my letter, he failed to respond to ALL points regarding the failings by his government to protect tax-payers from the banking abuse that existed on the governments ‘loan guarantee scheme.’ This scheme was used by many who were disadvantaged and would have been unable to start-up a viable business. By offering a 75% guarantee, the scheme encouraged the banks to lend. however, the scheme was marred with evidence highlighting bank failings and delays that proved detrimental to such start-up’s. As a result, many start-ups were failed. Or should I say many ‘people’ were failed! I was one of these people. Labour MPs did not want to represent me in all of this mess – deciding to protect their own government instead. I lost my viable business and soon my home. All my hardwork lost!

    My social mobility took a hard knock. I am still trying to get back on my feet. Governments need to do more to offer protection to the tax-payer in such cases. In the case of the scheme I used, it is clear that in order to form a relationship with banks, the government stepped back from protecting the service-user – the tax-payer. In addition, NO MP was willing to take, what was a National issue, to Westminster Hall seeking ALL party consensus on such serious matters. Again, both the government (who were meant to represent the people) and the bankers got away with failing the tax-payer.

    I would very much like to be in a role that support the aspirations of people in communities. People need to be aware of where best to invest their innovations and business plans. Upward social mobility is not only confidence-building and empowering to individuals, but also has a positive influence to family members, communities and the economy. Therefore, the ‘big society’ idea needs to communicate much better with teh community; and the policy needs to work favourably with the aspirations of people while also protecting those most vulnerable in society.

    The Coalition government, while reasonably fresh off teh block, has done little to stimulate communities and the people within them. Currently, the ‘big society’ remains a thesis – not a plan willing to highlight its full-breakdown structure in order to gain the confidence of community groups or to be challenges by opposition.

    Power clearly remains in control of government, media and bankers. Therefore, Empowerment needs to driven deep into the heart of communities if government really wants to strengthen relationships with communities and improve social mobility for those who are disadvantaged – but sufficiently enthusiatic to drive their aspirations forward.

    A change in attitude is required. My fear is that Ministers spend far too much time NOT going into the depths of REAL communities and listening to REAL people who have a REAL desire to reach goals. MPs also remain out of touch with the heavy task that is required from them – the lack of quality MP representation has failed communities by the influx of career politicians who try hard to show that they are doing something, but without really doing anything at all. Shameful!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s