About
Patrick Watson provides policy intelligence and analysis, with a range of other public affairs services, to clients in the education, skills, training and guidance sectors.
He is managing Director of Montrose Public Affairs Consultants Ltd.
He believes that the best education systems, worldwide, give autonomy to schools to run their own affairs. Centrally driven interventions should be kept to a minimum, and then only in inverse proportion to success. Interventions driven by short-term political agendas can be immensely damaging to learners’ interests. Evidence should inform policy and the system should be demand driven, accountable and transparent with learners’ interests paramount.
Education should not be a state monopoly and there should be mixed service provision, offering a diverse range of service providers from state, profit and not for profit sectors, demand rather than supply driven.
Good teachers and good teaching are at the core of the best education systems. It is essential to recruit the best, to give them the best training and to reward success. It is equally important to get rid of those who fail to meet the highest standards and so blight the life opportunities of our young people.
The Government’s role should be limited to maintaining an enabling environment, to allow autonomous schools to thrive, to ensure proper regulation and accountability for both standards and the use of public funds, whilst safeguarding the interests of the most disadvantaged, including, particularly, those most at risk of exclusion.
e-mal: montrosepw@ntlworld.com
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Recent
- CUTS IN THE EDUCATION BUDGET-NOT ACCORDING TO BALLS
- CONSERVATIVES EDUCATION POLICY-WHATS ON THE TABLE?
- IMPORTANCE OF TRUST IN SOCIETY AND EDUCATION
- SCHOOL GOVERNANCE IN A CHANGING POLICY ENVIRONMENT
- EARLY YEARS EDUCATION REFORM
- HOW TO IMPROVE TEACHING
- THE GENERAL TEACHING COUNCIL -CAN DO BETTER
- MARKET IN EDUCATION AND THE QUANGO EFFECT
- THE PURCHASER PROVIDER SPLIT-QUANGOS FAILING THE TEST
- DIPLOMAS WHAT NEXT?
- CENTRAL CONTROL AND INTERVENTION OVER CURRICULUM
- PRIMARY CURRICULUM REFORM
-
Links
-
Archives
- November 2009 (9)
- October 2009 (19)
- September 2009 (18)
- August 2009 (10)
- July 2009 (18)
- June 2009 (26)
- May 2009 (11)
- March 2009 (1)
-
Categories
- academies
- Careers advice and Guidance
- Charity Status
- Charter School
- Conservative policy
- curriculum
- early years learning
- education market
- education quangos
- education reform
- higher education
- Home Education
- IB
- independent schools
- primary schools
- published letters
- qualifications/exams
- quality assurance
- quality assurance and inspection
- QUANGOS
- school governance
- schools
- secondary schools
- skills
- ssat
- teachers and teaching
- Uncategorized
- universities
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
I absolutely agree!
Good teachers are the core and need reward, the bad ones need weeding out.
Thanks.Problem is that it is not being addressed.Producer interests would prefer to protect incompetent teachers job security rather than look to the interests of the child, though the childs prospects attainment and opporunities will be damaged by poor teachers. Poor teachers should be identified, given professional support if they have the potential to improve or eased out of the profession in the interests of children, and frankly themselves.